popolipopo publishes analysis, not disposable content. When a claim, number, source, screenshot, or experiment result is wrong, the correction has to repair the public record and the workflow that produced the error.
We trace the issue back to the artifact behind the article: the source note, export, script, screenshot, prompt, implementation log, or live experiment. If the public claim is wrong, we update the article. If the process created the mistake, we update the checklist or tooling that allowed it through.
Small spelling and formatting fixes may be corrected silently. Factual changes, changed conclusions, replaced datasets, or material context updates should be visible in the article or handled with an editor's note. If a piece can no longer be supported, it should be withdrawn or replaced rather than quietly rewritten into a different claim.
Send the article URL, the exact claim, the evidence you believe contradicts it, and whether the issue affects a sentence, a chart, a method, or the conclusion. Specific reports get reviewed faster because they can be checked against the original analysis.